offensive security & anti-abuse r&d

we break your product before attackers weaponize it at scale.

specialized in deep black-box pentesting, business logic exploitation, and automated fraud defense for high-growth apps and ai infrastructure.

$ scope --status=accepting · 2–6 week engagements · ≤5 clients

engagement.log

tty0 · live

$scope --engagement=federated-identity

> target: mobile & ai api endpoints

> vector: federated identity abuse (zero-cost scale)

> impact: bypassed rate limits, identified $50k+/mo cloud leak

> status: remediated at architecture level

$

abridged from a real engagement · names redacted

01 // core focus areas

four disciplines. one outcome:
hard to abuse.

every engagement is scoped around attack classes, not checklist compliance.

black-box security & reverse engineering

we start from a compiled binary and a login — never from a spec.

mobile apps (ios/android), private apis, and obfuscation testing.

iosandroidprivate-apiobfuscation

business logic & abuse r&d

the vulnerabilities scanners can't see — priced like product decisions.

preventing api abuse, signup farming, credit exploitation, and cloud resource draining.

signup-farmingcredit-abuseresource-drain

adversarial ai defense

your weights and your gpu budget are both attack surface.

testing model extraction, prompt injection, and gpu capacity starvation vectors.

model-extractionprompt-injectiongpu-starvation

custom poc & tooling

reproducible exploit code, plus the fix that kills the entire class.

no generic scanner pdfs — we write functional exploit code and architectural fixes.

exploit-pochardening-patchtooling

02 // the boutique difference

small team. zero delegation.

a boutique practice stays small by design: every engagement is run by the people who execute it.

01

direct senior attention

zero junior analysts. you work directly with the researchers who wrote your exploit — same people, from first call to final patch.

02

poc-driven

every critical finding ships as a reproducible proof-of-concept dashboard or script. if it can't be demonstrated, it doesn't ship.

03

unit economics defense

security treated as financial risk management — protecting cloud margins, chargeback exposure, and investor trust.

engagement/manifest.yaml

read-only

$ cat engagement/manifest.yaml

type:black-box

duration:2–6 weeks

team:2 senior researchers

output:poc + architecture fix

report:none — we fix it

$ exit 0

one engagement at a time · strictly limited

03 // track record & scope

sized for impact, not volume.

every engagement ends with three deliverables: a working proof-of-concept, a root-cause fix, and the real cost of the vulnerability. no generic scan reports — ever.

$1B+

unicorn infrastructure under assessment

2–6 wks

specialized engagement duration

<5

strictly limited concurrent clients

04 // private intake

direct line.

no sales team, no triage layers. your request lands in front of a researcher who has run assessments of this size before.

contact/channels

email

batuhan@abuse.ltd

book discovery call

20 minutes · scope fit & nda

request slot

ndas available before any detail is shared